footytube version 2.0 logo
ZEITGEIST: What are footytube users interested in today?

Most Exciting Matches

4

Most Popular

Goals of the Week

Latest Football News Videos

Most Recent Matches

footytube Blog

Posted by Andy Yesterday
The Confederation Cup this year has been a huge success with full strength teams turning up we were treated to some fantastic matches and some good old fashion cup upsets. here I present my team of the tournament and some conclusions.

GK - Howard (USA) Tournament rating : 9
Tim HowardIn my eyes, Howard had a slight edge over Julio Cesar when it came to Goalkeeper of the Tournament. He bolstered the defence and made more saves than any other goalkeeper in the competition at 33. He gave the USA a string of impressive performances, crucial to their undoubted success in the Confederations Cup. His goalkeeping awareness was showcased throughout the tournament and the final epitomised his footballing intelligence, regardless of the scoreline.
LB - Masilela (S.Africa) Tournament rating : 7
MasilelaMasilela was essentially the best of a bad bunch when it came to left-backs in the tournament. He played all 5 games for South Africa and had an impressive pass completion rate of 76%. He reflected the industrious nature of the South African squad, covering 50,000 metres during the tournament. He pushed up the field when he was needed as well as fulfilling his defensive duties when called upon.
CB - Onyewu (USA) Tournament rating : 8
OnyewuOnyewu’s central partnership with De Merit produced a number of classy defensive performances for the US. The defender was frightfully determined on the field, making the most clearances of any player in the tournament at 21. This determination was clearly evidenced in an efficient performance against Spain in the semi-finals, this particular game giving him the edge over De Merit in the Tournament XI.
CB - Lucio (Brazil) Tournament Rating : 9
LucioThe Brazilian captain provided an unparalleled leadership ethic, leading Brazil to the Confederations Cup final in style. Scoring the winning goal, Lucio’s contribution to the tournament cannot be underestimated. There is a great deal of responsibility placed on Brazilian centre-backs, as the full backs fly on up the field to spearhead the attack and Lucio dealt with this expertly throughout the tournament.
RB - Maicon (Brazil) Tournament Rating : 7
MaiconThere were no standout fullbacks at the tournament but one of the more effective was Maicon. The Internazionale right back had a solid tournament, a particular highlight being his performance against the USA in the group stages. He provided an assist from a free-kick for Brazil’s second goal and capped a fabulous Brazilian passing move with a glorious finish for their third.
CM - Dempsey (USA) Tournament Rating : 8
DempseyIn the latter stages of the tournament, the US team employed Brazilian-style counter-attack football, and Dempsey was at the centre of every move. His pace allowed him to orchestrate the devastating counter-attacks that lead to a number of US goals. As well as providing, Dempsey had a keen eye for goal during the tournament, bagging 3 goals for his side. He was a dynamo for the US squad and fulfilled a Kaka-type role in moving the ball out of defence and into attack.
CM - Kaka (Brazil) Tournament Rating : 10
KakaKaka entered the tournament on high expectations following his summer blockbuster transfer to Real Madrid. These expectations were not only met but exceeded by the Brazilian playmaker. He lead the Brazilian counter-attack and made the most successful solo runs of any player in the tournament. His blinding pace was complimented by impeccable finishing, clearly shown in his mesmerising goal against Egypt. He was the star player of the tournament for me.
CM - Aboutrika (Egypt) Tournament Rating : 8
AboutrikaAboutrika entered the tournament largely unknown, playing his club football for Al-Ahly in Egypt. Aboutrika had a very impressive tournament, always eager to get the ball and make things happen. He attempted the most passes out of any player for Egypt and ensured his presence was felt in the Egyptian midfield.
FW - Rossi (Italy) Tournament Rating : 8
RossiGiuseppe Rossi was among the few players who stood out for an exceedingly lacklustre Italian side in the Confederations Cup. He was a constant threat on the ball and was never afraid to shoot from long range. He scored two fantastic goals after coming on as a sub against the USA and clearly showed that he has what it takes to be a world-class striker in the upcoming years.
FW - Fabiano (Brazil) Tournament Rating : 9
FabianoLuis Fabiano showed glimpses of brilliance during the tournament and thoroughly deserved the golden boot award. He scored 5 goals in 5 games for Brazil, the most spectacular coming against the USA in the final. Fabiano currently has a better goal per game ratio than “Phenomenon” Ronaldo. If Brazil are to make it far in next years World Cup, both Kaka and Fabiano will be integral to any plans.
FW - Donovan (USA) Tournament Rating : 8
DonovanDonovan was one of the players to really make a difference at the tournament. He worked hard throughout the tournament, covering the second largest distance of any player and scoring 2 goals in the process. He showed great composure and an impressive first touch, as seen in his goal against Brazil in the final. He already holds legendary status within US football and this tournament has done a great deal in further cementing his legacy.
Manager - Bob Bradley (USA)
Bob BradleyBradley has come under intense scrutiny following a number of poor results in the World Cup qualifiers but this tournament thoroughly proved his managerial credentials. He was tactically in-tune against the worlds top two clubs, achieving a phenomenal feat. The US came agonisingly close to causing the biggest tournament upset in history, and Bob Bradley deserves a lot of the credit.


Confederations Cup Dilemmas and Conclusions.

1. South African football horns - A noisy nuisance or an irremovable cultural icon?
These football horns have been causing a great deal of controversy and have triggered an intense debate as to whether or not they are welcome at next years World Cup.

They are known as “Vuvuzelas” and have emerged relatively recently in South African domestic league football. The colour of the Vuvuzela determines which league team you support and the majority of South African football fans brought them along to the Confederations Cup. It is simply a long plastic horn which you blow into, to either make noise for the sake of it, or add atmosphere to the stadium, depending on your view. They are sounded incessently throughout the 90+ minutes and many criticise their distracting wasp-like drone accompaining the beautiful game. Following the opening stages of the Cup, FIFA was inundated with complaints requesting for the Vuvuzela’s to be outlawed in the upcoming World Cup.

Is the reaction of the western football world to the Vuvuzela’s justified or is it a product of narrow-minded football “purists” who seek a homogenous world game? I was initially a tad irked by the horns but as the Cup progressed, I came to realise they provide real atmosphere to the game and are the South African counterpart to the English rattle or the energetic samba drum beating in Brazil. International football embraces diversity and casting off an aspect of South African footballing culture because it doesn’t fit our own perception of the game is ignorant in the extreme. Football is played and supported in many different forms all across the world, no opinion as to how the game should be supported is in any way better than another and in this sense ignorance is coupled with arrogance in this debate, a “we know better,” attitude.
The overwhelming online opposition to the Vuvuzela is shocking and I seriously hope FIFA don’t cave in.
Links
http://www.banvuvuzela.com/ - Website pioneering online opposition to the Vuvuzela
http://www.southafrica.info/2010/vuvuzela.htm - S.A tourist website providing info on the Vuvuzela

2. Where does the USA go from here?
It is widely accepted that the Confederations Cup has been a wild success for the US team. The tournament has instilled confidence into US football fans who are now setting their sights on next years World Cup.
The US performance in the competition has proven that with determination and sound organisation skills, seemingly lacklustre sides can overcome the world’s best.
The US seemed shaky and unsure in their first two games of the competition, succumbing to a 3-1 defeat in the hands of a Giuseppe Rossi inspired Italy and a 3-0 drubbing by Brazil. These losses were compounded by an almost inherent lack of discipline within the US team, picking up red cards in both games.
Things looked gloomy for the US and the world was stunned when they fulfilled the tall order of beating Egypt in order to advance to the semis. The Egypt game saw a renewed confidence in the US team and they gathered significant momentum. An organised, defence-minded, counter attacking team took to the field against Spain and caused one of the greatest upsets of dare I say, of the decade? The US team had a real footballing identity and the pace of Dempsey, Donovan and Davies posed a constant threat.
Although it is far too easy to get carried away and rank the US among challengers for next years World Cup. Spirited performances indeed but even the powerhouses of world football have their blips and the US squad lack that special something that make teams like Brazil and Spain world-class.


3. Where does Italy go from here?
Since their World Cup success in 2006, the Italian squad have been labelled as being in free-fall. The displays in the Euro 2008 championships were a far cry from those seen two years previous. The hollow performances in the Euros resulted in the removal of Donadoni and the installation of Lippi. Lippi has retained an unbeaten record in the World Cup qualifiers but the quality of the opposition is up for debate. Any hopes that Italian fans may have mustered from the qualifiers may have been dashed by the lacking performances seen in the Confederations Cup.
The criticism of the squad within the Italian media has only worsened as a string of relatively poor results has been compounded by even worse performances. The talent is undoubtedly there but the passion truly isn’t. The Confederations Cup has only gone on to exacerbate tensions surrounding the squad as they suffered humiliation in the hands of the USA, failing to advance past the group stages. The team looked limp in the face of Brazil, sharply contrasted by the mentality of the US squad as they met Brazil in the final. The 3-0 result was a comprehensive one, when it really shouldn’t have been against the World Champions. The squad lacked the hunger shown in the last World Cup that served them so well.
If Italy are to mount a serious challenge in the upcoming World Cup, a serious reshuffle has to take place as the current formula is evidently a failed one. They just don’t look like World Cup winners when they play and unless serious change takes place, there is little chance of retaining the title next year.


4. Mark “not so,” Bright.
This is exclusive for UK users (sorry) as the BBC have used the Confederations Cup as a springboard for their new-ish commentator, Mark Bright.
He used to be a pundit every now and again on “Final Score” but has recently been bumped a couple of notches and I have no idea why... He commentated on a Milan Derby last year and has commentated on every evening kick-off Confederations Cup match.

I don’t mean to come across as blunt… but …he is downright dreadful. He gives no real tactical insight, his commentary lacks any substance and I am left longing for Andy Gray. I am not a big fan of British commentators and pundits and Bright is the worst of the lot, but I suppose I am spoilt by the comparatively fabulous coverage RTE provide. His commentary seems to rely on meaningless historical filler even the weakest of football fans could spit out. He makes countless mistakes and even though I am aware of his past experience as a professional footballer, you can’t help but question his fan credentials as evidenced by his obvious lack of knowledge. I mean, he was under the impression that Bocanegra was still a Fulham player in the Confed semi-final.
What makes it even more frustrating is the way the BBC are shamelessly plugging him in order to ease his career further. They have their second string punditry team reference Bright during their half-assed analysis in weak attempts to validate his wholly impotent statements. He is simply annoying, he doesn’t enhance your viewing of the game but rather takes away from it. For those who haven’t heard him commentate it may seem as if I am having a go for the sake of it, but all he really does is distract from the game.
I think it is safe to say that Mark Bright is more effective than a Vuvuzela in disrupting the beautiful game.
Andy is a staff member and supports Rangers

Staff

Featured Fans

 
 
 
 
No games played in the last 24 hours

Compilation Videos

He Said What!
Interviewer: Would it be fair to describe you as a volatile player? David Beckham: Well, I can play in the centre, on the right and occasionally on the left side.
- David Beckham

Popular Channels Today

Video Virals