The news came yesterday Sinan Bolat will be suspended for the next day's championship. The proposed transaction has been accepted by the custodian of the Standard has apologized for the words spoken in the field of Genk (Editor's note: at the same time, Jelle Vossen denies insulting Sinan Bolat). Sudpresse raises an important question this morning: "Bolat suspended, the time of Van Hout or Blazic. Which of them therefore defend the goals Sunday? "Since the beginning of the championship, coach Rouches chose a point between his two guards reserves. Every two games, Van Hout and Blazic take place on the bench. In theory, the honor of defending the cage against the locals should return to Balzic. However, between a place on the bench and field, yardstick margin there. The choice looks complicated. For Kristof Van Hout did well against the leader last Sunday. "

How, then analyze what happened between Sinan Bolat and Genk striker? Several specialists are examining the issue in the columns of Sudpresse. Guy Martens First, the goalkeeping coach for evaluating the response of Genk Liege goalkeeper. "On land, we often hear such remarks and I'll even go further. In training, sometimes Genk players let go of such expressions. Jean-François Lecomte Sinan Bolat think that it accumulated a lot of pressure early in the game and the pot has finally exploded. "In the images of the game at Genk, it is clear that there were several verbal exchanges and then, his character bubbling did the rest. (...) Ok, He said other words but I think that exclusion is the appropriate punishment. He was penalized, he and his team penalized basta. To me, he would not even deserve a week's suspension. "

Het Belang van Limburg questioned Robert Jeurissen, referees boss about the "case" Bolat. "Regarding the threats, there is nothing in the regulations. In the Netherlands, as in many other countries people are less tolerant on this issue. "Does this mean that with a Belgian referee, the penalty would have been different? Ask ...

Before the game at Genk, Jos Vaessen had once again split a provocative statement in the newspapers, claiming that Steven Defour had joined the Standard on the basis of Act 78 and the median and had broken his contract in Limburg . Worse, even Jos Vaessen said that the Standard had tried to do the same thing with Kevin De Bruyne. Today, the reactions fuse. In Sudpresse First, Steven Defour puts things in place. "How many times will he still show these lies? Everything is very clear. To say that I broke my contract at Genk is wrong! When in 2006 the Standard was interested in me, and we found common ground, the direction of Liège has sought an agreement with its counterpart in Limburg, on arrival, pay $ 1, 5 million euros. Nothing more, nothing less. " Patrick Koster is the agent of Kevin De Bruyne and he pulls no punches. "Jos Vaessen is a liar! (...) How can you lie so much? "The officer confirms what everybody knows, namely that there has been interest in the Standard and Anderlecht for his player. But at no time was there any plans to use the law of 78. "The words of Vaessen moved because they discredit a player I represent, but also because they have no other purpose than to inflame and ignite hatred among fans who no already not the best relationship in the world. "In Het Nieuwsblad, President of Genk confirms:" Jos was based on rumors that have never been confirmed and were initiated by another manager who wanted to be consulted in the transaction. "

The Nieuwsblad yet still takes the news was announced yesterday by the club's official website for the future stage of the Standard. A meeting was held yesterday between the various parties involved in the project. It was agreed to await the announcement of the host of the 2018 World Cup to advance this issue.

VOSSEN!!! Simply the best