Manchester City=> Madchester City. LOL

can't help but hate on City...smh
best of luck this Sunday lads!

haha, no way...but it was better from him.

But at least Chelsea qualified for Europa League last 32. Not like Man City, they are completely out of European football this season. By the way I'll support the Red Devils and Barca.

definitely not, will be supporting BVB.

^ What is wrong with you. I know so MANY fans from other EPL teams who supported Chelsea. Footytube comments used to be full of wished from them. Not Fair!
UNITY!

i like the respect you give other teams. unlike some other fans who just hates.

Roman is the best thing to happen to Chelsea he has accelerated our climb to the echelons of European football. its a shame when i hear fans like u spit bile on such a passionate billionaire who has tried to make sure we get the best in terms of players and coaches at any cost. he is human and some of his decisions will be unpopular or ill-informed but we can all be sure that he isnt making those decisions to jeopardise the team rather it is for the better. Have u ever asked urself why Roman who can afford himself any amount of fun on a daily basis till he dies chose to be so emotionally attached to the club? He loves the club theres no doubt about that..if he makes decisions and it doesnt work out well in hindsight u must accept its a genuine mistake not a control freak thing like you are making it out to be.

Oh yh know doubt he is the best thing that's ever happend to us. But don't be delusional, chelsea is a business to him and he's not just after a turnover in money he wants the label of no.1 'I am the Best look what i created' He is power hungry...you think he'll stick around if we don't win anything in the next 3 years..i doubt it he'll get his money back and go elsewhere. The fact is I am disgusted with the way chelsea is being run sacking manager after manager buying player after player and blaming the manager when these players don't gel and not coming up with our own youth and yet we have one of the best youth squads out there. He wants instant success which is understandable but he drove away the one man that could and did do this for us and that was jose. And what are you talking about the decisions he has been making haven't been working for the last 5-6 years and he still hasn't learned from them. And well of course he is a control freak he owns a club he's aloud to be but he doesn't understand football and the board are useless at guiding him just a bunch of yes men. The fans would much rather not win the CL and PL for the next 2,3,4 years and then go on to be powerhouses of football for the next 10-20 with a new model (much like man u) then get instant success for 3-4 years and then nothing for ages. He want's chelsea to be the envy of every team, a revolution...well he's going the wrong way about it

I mean yh in the last 5-6 years we've won 4 fa cups 1 PL 1 CL and the league cup but that was all on instant success and now we are struggling because in them years we didn't build a squad we stuck with the same players and didn't introduce youth to learn from the best such a lamps JT and drogba and now without them we aren't doing as well. I don't blame the new players because they are still gelling but if we had introduced youth at an earlier stage, not necessarily these players, we would be in good condition now and good enough to win titles. I'm not sure if we are this year :/

I give you an 'A' mate,

+

You are in trouble too mate trust me...there's no favourite for this years competition. we might be out but we can blame it on the transition our team is struggling with.

Since we beat u guys on our way to victory away at bayern in the final so many experienced players have left and we basically have a new team and trying to rebrand our style of play buying young stars to play and grow together...that is planning mate. But i know peeps like you only see what u want to see....whatever makes u sleep well son.

I acknowledge the team is in a transitional stage - what you're paying for now is the lack of planning from years and years of myopic Abramovich policy; and I don't trust the "rebranding" yet when after a few bad matches the coach who finally, against all odds, conquered the Holy Grail for Chelsea is sacked because Roman is sad about the events of the last 20 seconds.

If Chelsea build a sustainable model with a young team, I really don't see myself hating on it. I have better things to do.

Also, how am I in trouble? I'm not personally in trouble if my team goes out, and my team has won its group. Also, I've seen my team win this competition three times since 2006, most fans don't see their team win the CL three times EVER, and I very much appreciate that privilege.

@Bayern13: You're absolutely right about that. "The world of football was served justice by showing all that once in a a blue moon even a thunder hits the toilet that is Chelsea." That made me LOL. You're spot on. ;-)

Bayern13...u are such a pathethic case of extreme bitterness and the vile u spit from your sewage will only add to ur stench. Chelsea have become a Worldwide brand just like Real Madrid,ManU,Milan etc bcos of Roman's money what is wrong with that? Every team that has dominated Europe in any era owe much of that to their financial clout and we are no exception.
Let me tell u who u are son...u were lucky to be born into a wealthy family and you flouted your parents riches in our faces but we put up with it bcos u were obviously way above our level. now we won the lottery...and can buy who we want,spending the paper like its going out of fashion and now u are BITTER?!!

you are a disgrace to concede an equaliser in the 88th min, miss a penalty in extra time,bungled ur penalty shoot out after being 3-1 ahead before Lampards kick and all this happened in front of the goal where your fan base where camped. You have lost 2 finals in how many years?

SHAME ON YOU!!

Champ119...i see bitter birds of the same feather flock together, u both lost to us lolxx come back for a chat if u are the next european champion.

"Every team that has dominated Europe in any era owe much of that to their financial clout" you make me LOL aside did man u get CL cause of money? did barca? did liverpool? there are teams that can do it without injecting millions and just buying superstars and getting lucky

if u make a list of all the teams that were in the competition in those years i'm sure u will notice that richer teams did better in the competition.period!

Of course you need a rich club to win the CL. The last financial underdog to do it was Porto 8+ years ago, and even they aren't exactly a pub team from Yorkshire.

What is true is that Chelsea, like City and PSG or to some extent Málaga, are teams that have come from somewhere around upper to lower mid-table existences and been given an instant boost by extremely rich owners. I'm no fan of that but I wouldn't hate on it because football is a business and the team I support is rich too. What I find disturbing is instant-gratification clowns like Abramovich who don't appear to give a flying f#ck about the traditions and the style of a club and think they can inject money, buy immediate success and blame any manager who doesn't achieve it within weeks. And as we've seen, you can also achieve success within weeks and still get sacked when you have a few bad results next season. That's just pretty messed up.