wowy well said man whoop whoop

You are deluded. How did we flop? We were superior to villareal and deserved to win. The penalty just added gloss to the win. And walcott did not dive, he was moving very fast and took a tumble. In the replay it is clear he was touched but only after the villareal defender had touched the ball so it was an unfair call. BUt there was no intent to get a call, no arsenal player made any sort of shout, not even walcott.

i know! haha..

yeah, the way united scrapped by porto on a goal which was pure luck he drove it in? a decent keeper would have stopped a shot coming in from that far out. GK didn't react at all

yeah typical. they're just saving themselves for the romping of man u right?

i think walcott is getting a bit full of himself.

I still don't really understand what the arguing was about, it looked like a clear-cut foul to me.
Why shouldn't it have been a penalty? Was Walcott offside? Please answer.

well it was minimal contact and it did look like walcott was already going down. to me i think it could have gone either way. but all these analysts are saying it was a horrid call. thing is they're watching it in slow motion, and in the speed of the game in certainly does look like a foul.

are you crazy? There was absolutely no contact with the man, and the Arsenal player chose to fall to get the penalty. The Arsenal player should have been given a yellow card for faking.

there was contact, but the villareal player got ball before man, and even if there wasn't contact walcott did not dive, at such high speeds as walcott was moving the slightest touch will make him fly and that is what happened. Only in slow motion can one see that that was not a penalty. Notice that after the tackle no arsenal player made any shout. They all thought ut was a corner and you can see them drifting in that manner just before the refree pointed. penalty ot no penalty arsenal won fair and square and very deservedly.