Manchester United censor Phil Jones comments on Charlie Adam 'dive'
• Phil Jones remarks 'too inflammatory' for MUTV to show
• Liverpool's Charlie Adam accused over free-kick
by Daniel Taylor 1 year ago
Also about this match
Sir Alex Ferguson: Patrice Evra will pursue Luis Suárez racism claim
Liverpool and Manchester United's caution makes for stalemate

Charlie Adam's involvement in Liverpool's goal during Saturday's 1-1 draw prompted so much anger among Sir Alex Ferguson's players that Manchester United had to censor a television interview with Phil Jones.

Jones accused the Scottish midfielder of deliberately diving to win the free-kick from which Steven Gerrard scored. The former Blackburn Rovers player did not hold back in his criticisms and MUTV, United's in-house television channel, took instructions from senior Old Trafford officials before deciding Jones's comments were too inflammatory to be shown.

Although Rio Ferdinand admitted he had made "the slightest contact" on Adam, United were incensed about the way the player went to ground, believing it to be a deliberate attempt to dupe the referee, Andre Marriner.

Ferguson, who later accused Luis Suárez of "diving all over the place", described it as "a very soft award", but Jones went even further with his own criticisms, telling MUTV that Adams had been guilty of a blatant dive.

However, MUTV, who infamously once pulled a show involving Roy Keane because he had been so outspoken against his own team-mates, had edited out the relevant section when Jones's interview was shown on Saturday night.

Adam, informed of United's complaints, denied he had made the most of the challenge. "Well, everyone has an opinion," the former Blackpool player said. "I felt a touch and if I hadn't gone down I would have been clear through on goal so there must have been contact. That's the way I look at it. I felt contact when I went past Rio and that's the way it goes."

He added: "I'm not that type of player. I'm not just going to go down easily. It was a foul and that is why the referee gave it."

Ferdinand had already been booked and was fortunate once the free-kick was awarded that Marriner did not show a second yellow card. The defender said: "There was the slightest contact but I don't think enough to make a fella who is 12, 13 stone fall on the floor like that, but that's the way the game is today."

Recent articles about Liverpool and Manchester United
West Ham agree a fee of £15m for Liverpool striker Andy Carroll Today
Russell Brand on Alex Ferguson: 'A unique figure in the football faith' Today
Manchester United bank £60.8m in Premier League TV payments Today
Liverpool close in on City's Kolo Touré to shore up central defence 1 day ago
David Moyes to tell Wayne Rooney his future lies at Manchester United 1 day ago

More from
Manchester UnitedLiverpool
Share your thoughts
Sign in to comment
Page 1 of 1
I feel for him, if he doesn't go down he probably doesn't score, but the ref probably wouldn't call the foul. I play soccer at low-competitive level, and never go to ground, but I do feel I don't get the call as much as I should. Rio's right, the game is going that way. That being said, I'd like to see more yellow's for diving. Can't have that s**t.
I believe Adam was more interested to get Ferdinand sent off (of course everyone at Anfield that day was aware Ferdinand was on one yellow),hence the elaborate dive. The fact that the free kick resulted in a goal was a big bonus.

However I believe the referee made the best decision he could under the circumstances he was put in. A foul but not enough to warrant a yellow.Some said the ref didnt show yellow because Ferdinand was already on one yellow but I believe that was not the case. It was simply a foul that dint warrant a yellow. Its normal, a lot of them was given in every other game.
elaborate dive?! he fell forwards after Ferdinard catching his boot, there was nothing elaborate about it! If you're looking for elaborate, how about Evra rolling around in his own box and refusing to move off the pitch for treatment so the game could continue after he got clipped on the knee by Suarez?

I do agree however that another yellow would have been harsh as it was clearly not a deliberate foul.
Rio Ferdinand admitted he had made "the slightest contact" on Adam....when everyone admitted there was contact....so y man utd fan are arguing and moaning now....even rio admitted that....so get a life haters
because the contact was on his little toe...definitely not enough to fall down...he dived, don't play dumb
+2
haha vaishnav,get a life
Related videos
04:35 • 1 year ago
1 year ago
02:03 • 1 year ago
06:55 • 1 year ago
02:29 • 1 year ago
Show all 8 videos
Trending articles
José Mourinho clear to rejoin Chelsea for free as Real Madrid confirm exit
Italy cries foul over penalty that helped Milan into Champions League
Chelsea grateful to long-overdue Torres as Everton are finally seen off
David Moyes to tell Wayne Rooney his future lies at Manchester United
Football transfer rumours: Edinson Cavani to join Mourinho at Chelsea?
Ten Premier League storylines that will dominate this summer
Bundesliga signs off with a madcap afternoon of comedy and drama
Borussia Dortmund's banner plans blocked by Wembley red tape
Michael Mancienne flourishes in Mighty Mouse's Hamburg footsteps
Russell Brand on Alex Ferguson: 'A unique figure in the football faith'
Manchester United bank £60.8m in Premier League TV payments
José Mourinho will face greater expectations at Chelsea this time round
West Ham agree a fee of £15m for Liverpool striker Andy Carroll
NYCFC has Man City and Yankees as backers but there are still big obstacles
Phil Neville pitches for the vacant Everton manager's job
Tony Pulis sacking was largely down to Stoke's failure to raise the bar
   
Kick4Life - changing lives through football