Liverpool 1-1 Manchester United: five things we learned
Steven Gerrard is still a class act and Wayne Rooney doesn't need protecting, but questions still dog Andy Carroll
by Andy Hunter at Anfield 1 year ago
Also about this match
Sir Alex Ferguson: Patrice Evra will pursue Luis Suárez racism claim
Manchester United censor Phil Jones comments on Charlie Adam 'dive'

Steven Gerrard's standing has not diminished

Talk of a new contract for Liverpool's captain may have seemed premature this week – his current deal doesn't expire until 2013 and the future can wait for a midfielder who has endured an arduous 2011 – but it demonstrated his value to Kenny Dalglish's team and that was reinforced here. Gerrard's first start in seven months, since Manchester United's last visit to Anfield, resulted in an influential display and, more importantly, a full 90 minutes. He produced the breakthrough when, having spotted a gap on the right of the United wall, between Ryan Giggs and Danny Welbeck, he told Charlie Adam to leave the free-kick. Gerrard also brought welcome balance to the Liverpool midfield. His return enabled Adam to leave the holding duties to Lucas Leiva and offer more support to the attack than he has previously done this season.

Wayne Rooney doesn't need kid gloves

Sir Alex Ferguson rarely permits outside influences to disrupt Manchester United, but the combination of Rooney and a return to his native Merseyside is a strange exception. Last September, Ferguson omitted the forward from a 3-3 draw at Everton on the basis that the bear-pit of Goodison Park was no place for a man troubled by revelations about his private life. His poor form at the time and contract dispute had nothing to do with it, apparently. He was on the bench at Anfield having been "devastated" by the three-match ban that rules him out of the group stage of Euro 2012. No one disputes Rooney's reaction to Uefa's ruling, but leaving him to stew among the substitutes is not the solution. He has never risen to the bait at Anfield before and given "Who's the scouser in the wig?" was the most vicious chant he faced on Saturday afternoon, he was not likely to.

Ferguson's negative move was understandable

Only Ferguson will know whether his starting XI represented a snub to Rooney, plus Anderson and Nani for that matter, but there is no question he had to inject more defensive strength into his midfield after United's previous three league performances at Anfield. All had been characterised by a surprising lack of fight from the visitors and last season's 3-1 reverse, when Luis Suárez's virtuoso display met no resistance, demanded a response. Expectations for this game dropped the moment the team-sheet arrived, with United clearly intent on stifling Liverpool's supply to their Uruguayan striker. With the quality of passing and number of chances also deteriorating, this was a tough one to sell to Kuala Lumpur.

Andy Carroll isn't even Liverpool's first-choice target man

At the risk of irritating Dalglish by highlighting a player who didn't feature in the game, the biggest setback delivered to an England forward this afternoon was not to Rooney, but Andy Carroll. The auditions for Rooney's place at next summer's European Championship are now under way, but Liverpool's £35m centre-forward is still in the process of proving his worth at club level. As was said at the time, judgment on Carroll's goalscoring performance in the recent Merseyside derby was clouded by the early red card for Everton's Jack Rodwell – although he had struggled against the Everton defence until cleverly losing his marker to score the crucial opening goal – but Dalglish opted for a one-man attack against United and Carroll was left on the bench throughout. Liverpool's target man was Suárez, not the towering former Newcastle United man, which must concern a player bought for that purpose.

David de Gea's adaptation is gathering pace

The inquests and the doubts were inevitable from the moment United opted for the young Spaniard as Edwin van der Sar's successor, but, gradually, he is putting the early-season problems behind him and showing Ferguson has secured an outstanding talent. David de Gea produced a commanding display to deny Liverpool victory, standing up well to Suárez's chance in the first half, retaining concentration seconds after Javier Hernández had equalised to thwart Dirk Kuyt at the back post and producing an athletic save to tip away Jordan Henderson's measured volley in injury time. Equally impressive was his authority in the six-yard box, where Adam and Gerrard delivered a testing range of set pieces.

Recent articles about Liverpool and Manchester United
West Ham agree a fee of £15m for Liverpool striker Andy Carroll Today
Russell Brand on Alex Ferguson: 'A unique figure in the football faith' Today
Manchester United bank £60.8m in Premier League TV payments Today
Liverpool close in on City's Kolo Touré to shore up central defence 1 day ago
David Moyes to tell Wayne Rooney his future lies at Manchester United 1 day ago

More from
Manchester UnitedLiverpool
Share your thoughts
Sign in to comment
Page 1 of 2
I think this was the best played game by united at anfield in several years. Ferguson always puts up a defensive side at anfield. I don't know why united fans are complaining about it so much, calling it a second rate side. The whole point of keeping his choice strikers and nani on the bench was to contain luis suarez as much as possible, and it worked fairly well.
Last year at anfield however you started with nani and rooney on the pitch (and an in form joint-top scoring berbatov) and we all know how that worked out. I think ferguson was wise to keep his strikers on till the end when everyone was tired. skrtel will always have trouble keeping up with chicharito in even at the beginning of the game and in the end managed to salvage a precious point at anfield.
haters take your best shot.. i guess..?
for all the people who are saying it was lucky. no 1 wins championships by luck n u hv to create ur own luck
FAIL
+5
how is it always lucky to come from behind and score goals despite not playing well. They do it week in week out and thats what man utd are all about.. as a fan i can admit they did'nt have the best of games. but we were able to salvage a point in the end. Thats what champions do.
uniteds performance just shows their quality, they had basically 2 real chances
without rooney they have nothing, it was lucky for them chicarito got a lucky goal
another lucky goal from United I have to say...
Yeah..always United are the "lucky ones". Good corner, first head touch by Welbeck and then Chicharito (who moved brilliantly) scored with the head. How the hell is that lucky?.

Nothing to say about Gerrards goal? The fact that Giggs move from the wall and the wall just went past him...plus the fact that he admitted after the game that he wanted to shot the ball over the wall and didn't manage to?
+2
My boy, chicharito! I think he just might be my new favorite Mancunian. I mean, he's still got a lot to prove, but man has he already put a nail in the popularity coffin. The guy is a goal machine, and he really impressed me with that bouncing header. That is not an easy thing to do- to shift you're shoulders like that mid-run while judging the ball through a crowd of players. The guy should start- always!
de gea!! spectacular!!
liverpool played a good game. united didnt play the football we have been getting used to lately (free flowing attacking) yet managed to get a win. i would say its a good result for united given the complicated atmosphere of anfield and the weakness of our starting XI. could've been a win had giggs not moved though :\
I still don't understand why SAF played so negatively. No disrespect to Liverpool but they can't even get to half the talent United have when they play free flowing attacking football. I don't think I've seen United play so negatively before and it was probably the worst I've seen them play in years yet they still managed to get a draw.
They were being cautious, that was Anfield after all
+1
they were just lucky rubbish once more... nothing new!
I don't get it why ppl are talking about luck either they dont know what the true meaning of luck(newton's hint about gravity is luck) or else i think they don't really know that a striker isn't some fool who only plays on the ball a striker is also about being able to play off the ball...that being said luck is only bestowed on you if do the minimum required to make it happen, what united did !!! @cokes if united are rubbish then how about your so better team that did not win the EPl for decades O_o are you going to tell me that over several years united players going in and out were so lucky that we have 19 epl titles now xD...the thing is that you have to first to accept the average performance of your team over the years so that you ppl may hope to improve and not just put on the blame on others for your negative outputs!!!!
+2
It also appears that Henderson plays FAR better in a central role, rather than out wide right.
+7
Liverpool has too many central midfielders
De Gea save ur day man utd
+4
yup he saved us and we won a valuable point because we werent in good form, u should be mad with liverpool they had to do much more in home, but still they played very well and tested de gea a lot
^ L'pool was in bad form, Man U in its usual. Remember, when Liverpool is at its best, not even the almighty DEITIES can withstand their might.
+1
lol...tottenham can
+3
same goes with united..remember for the past two meetings vidic was not in the first eleven..united's bench was stronger than their first eleven.
+2
that's why your were with your back against the wall as soon as your bench was on the pitch... think!
we probably would have won if Nani, rooney and Hernendez started..o wells...Liverpool isn't exactly Ferguson's top priority anyways...we still have champions league games this coming week...and we will probably beat Liverpool at Old Trafford..


Now I just hope Liverpool can beat Manchester City to balance out our lost points at Anfield..
Exactly. United have bigger fish to fry in the next couple of weeks I think SAF is looking at the bigger picture a lot of his players have just come back from International duty and the game in the Champions League is important as they only have 2 points from 2 games at the moment and they really need to beat City to lay down a marker of intent. I mean if United are sat on the top of the league after next week they would have beaten City,Arsenal,Chelsea, Totenham and drawn with Liverpool. For a team that historically starts badly and finishes very strong that would be a GREAT start especially when you consider Spurs aside City haven't been really tested yet the same goes with Chelsea.
i love the "we probably would have won if" statements.... hind sight is always 20/20 isn't it?
Related videos
04:35 • 1 year ago
1 year ago
02:03 • 1 year ago
06:55 • 1 year ago
02:29 • 1 year ago
Show all 8 videos
Trending articles
José Mourinho clear to rejoin Chelsea for free as Real Madrid confirm exit
Italy cries foul over penalty that helped Milan into Champions League
David Moyes to tell Wayne Rooney his future lies at Manchester United
Chelsea grateful to long-overdue Torres as Everton are finally seen off
Football transfer rumours: Edinson Cavani to join Mourinho at Chelsea?
Ten Premier League storylines that will dominate this summer
Bundesliga signs off with a madcap afternoon of comedy and drama
José Mourinho will face greater expectations at Chelsea this time round
Michael Mancienne flourishes in Mighty Mouse's Hamburg footsteps
Russell Brand on Alex Ferguson: 'A unique figure in the football faith'
West Ham agree a fee of £15m for Liverpool striker Andy Carroll
Phil Neville pitches for the vacant Everton manager's job
Tony Pulis sacking was largely down to Stoke's failure to raise the bar
NYCFC has Man City and Yankees as backers but there are still big obstacles
Everton's Leon Osman signs new two-year contract with Goodison club
Stoke City sack manager Tony Pulis after seven years in charge
   
Kick4Life - changing lives through football