

Manchester United took the points, along with the satisfaction of their best start to a season in 25 years, but Chelsea left Old Trafford far from empty-handed. We have not yet seen enough of André Villas-Boas to come to firm conclusions, but on his first visit to Old Trafford he demonstrated a sense of adventure that contributed to a wackily entertaining game and held out the promise of interesting times ahead.
Boring Chelsea? Manchester United the super-efficient goal machine?
Neither of those current stereotypes survived this extraordinary match, a helter-skelter ride of fine goals and head-clutching errors – and that is to take into account only the individual contributions of Wayne Rooney and Fernando Torres, both of whom touched the heights of the sublime and the depths of the gor-blimey.
On the stroke of half-time, Rooney was in position to slot home a loose ball from close range, giving United what seemed to be an utterly conclusive 3-0 lead. A quarter of an hour after the resumption, he spooned a penalty kick wide and high as his feet slid away from under him in the manner made famous by David Beckham in Istanbul and John Terry in Moscow.
By that time Chelsea had taken a goal back. Barely 20 seconds after the resumption, Nicolas Anelka – who had just replaced Frank Lampard – prodded a glorious ball into the inside-left channel for Torres, whose deft right-footed finish did full justice to the pass. Suddenly all was well with the troubled Spaniard. This, surely, would be the moment in which his talent unblocked itself. Now the goals would flow.
Forty minutes later, everything changed again in a moment of pure horror. Here was a miss that will be replayed for as long as Torres fails to reproduce the form that made him such a reliable goalscorer in six seasons with Atlético Madrid and the first three years of his Liverpool career.
With seemingly nerveless panache, he ran on to Ramires's excellent pass and rounded David de Gea. There were five minutes left on the clock, and a further five minutes to be added by the fourth official; a goal would have made the score 3-2 and, given the openness of the game and the way Chelsea had been playing, the defending champions would have been thrown back on desperate defence. Instead, from a distance of six yards, Torres put the ball wide of the vacant goal. The demons were back.
"The worst things happen to the best strikers in the world, and today it happened to both of them," Villas-Boas said in a level-headed assessment that betrayed none of the disappointment he must have felt after his side had taken the game to United from the start and then responded to going three goals down by redoubling their efforts.
"In the first half they could have scored two or three," Sir Alex Ferguson admitted, and the catalogue of chances spurned or denied began as early as the third minute, when De Gea kicked away Ramires's first‑time shot. Ten minutes later Anderson made Torres a gift of the ball 20 yards from the United goal, but after swerving inside Jonny Evans the striker was unable even to hit the target. Midway through the half Juan Mata provided a lovely pass for Torres, who might have shot but, perhaps remembering his success as a provider against Bayer Leverkusen five days earlier, opted to square the ball to Ramires, who should have given De Gea no opportunity to make a save from point-blank range.
As it was, Chelsea went in at the interval with the game seemingly out of their hands, which made their subsequent response all the more impressive. Villas‑Boas's decision to switch from 4-3-3 to 4-2-4 by sending on Anelka in place of Lampard, who had produced a limp 45 minutes under the gaze of Fabio Capello, spoke of a brave refusal to cave in to the champions. Torres's goal immediately after the resumption brought the game straight back to life, and thereafter United could never be entirely comfortable.
The number of attempts on goal was exceeded only by a frequency of errors so astonishing that on the half-hour both Ferguson and Villas-Boas could be seen, while Branislav Ivanovic received treatment on the pitch, taking the opportunity to lecture key central midfield players on the need to tighten things up.
It made little difference. The match continued as it had begun, an enthralling and sometimes hilarious parade of scatter-brained mistakes and heart-stopping incidents. "Madness in great ones must not unwatch'd go," Shakespeare's King Claudius said, and those inside Old Trafford on Sunday could not be sure whether they had bought tickets to the Theatre of Dreams or the Theatre of the Absurd. Neither could Torres, to whose torment there seems no end.






![]() |
||
![]() |
but i know more talent that could use your help to get noticed and achieve their dreams, and hopefully someday also be able to entertain you guys
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KY10gOxMI1Q
second verse is mine, dont forget to subscribe
go blues!!
Dumb comment now fixed.
torres will be back in form in due time...
this girl is doesnt know what shes talking about..
I'm sorry to have gone off-topic, I just felt the need to comment on this writing itself and not the story it tells.
As to the misses we saw in the United v. Chelsea game, as United fan, my heart skipped a beat at every chance Chelsea got. As we all saw, Torres showed a great deal of efforts in that game and he shouldn't be judged on that miss alone. That kind of miss happens. That's all. It's just one game, and instead of discussing the miss, I'd prefer to talk about the way Torres played in general in that game. I hope both he and Villas-Boas would take the positives from that game and keep up the good job. SAF once commented on Torres being unsharp and the reason why. He said that, if I recall correctly, strikers rely on confidence alot, so Torres only needs that to be back on track. In my opinion, if Villas-Boas benches him at the next game, it won't do both Chelsea and Torres any good.
I agree with Villas-Boas' statement saying the final score did not reflect on the game that day. If their finishings were good, United could have lost or at least gotten a draw only.
Just out of curiosity, can you give an example of any of these things? Or do you also realize how amazingly ambiguous and subjective those statements are?
1. The Title. Ambiguous as f**k. Do you get what's the title trying to say? Is it that Torres was revived and then suddenly the demons return at Old Trafford? Or was he revived in front of the demons? See? Trying hard to make a 'BAM!'-title and ended up annoying and confusing (ok, I wouldn't assume all of you agree) me.
2. The closing paragraph and the Shakespear's quotation?! Why would he quote Shakespeare on this? It's not that I don't appreciate Shakespeare, but this is an article about football, it'd be nice if we could have a quote from a football great instead. Oh and, what does that quote have to do with what happened at the Old Trafford? Who is the great one who should be paid attention too in case he had gone insane and thus would pose a threat? The try-hard is so apparent here (as in he had decided that this football story should not be just football); He clearly did not think that through (as in "f**k this, i'm gonna add some drama, and for that I'd need demons and Mr. Shakespeare); and in the end did it halfway (Well, if you had chosen to add Shakespeare and Demons, might as well add even more of those and not just at the beginning and the end).
Moreover, the writer closed his article with (of course) a dramatic ending by drawing a picture of how the footy fans who were there would contemplate to ask whether they had just watched the game not at the Theatre of Dreams but at the Theatre of the Absurd and how Torres's torments would seem to continue. He did not care how Torres played in the CL just a few days ago. No, because he wanted to write about how Torres is currently cursed by the demons and tormented so badly.
I wont go any further. If this writing fits your style, then don't let my rant hinder you any further. You are free to ignore whatever you don't like. Especially on the internet :)
This is so off-topic. Sorry to other footy fans here. I'm out!
From a united fan. Torres should i had two lit alone his first hat trick for chelsea
But flashes of his old self were there regardless, the goal he scored was excellent.