So with this new transfer window increasing the price of several players most of us have a few players that have gone up in price. For example: Dzeko was 8 million and increased to a whopping 15 million.

Anyways, so far I have recorded a profit of 30 million off the price adjustment. Only 3 of my players were left untouched.

Anyways I asked Matt and he said that we will not profit from these changes. If you were to sell Dzeko, you will only get 8 million from the sale. It is impossible to gain more than the 115m and 125m budgets

Young, Silva and Rakovsky in. Abbiati, Krasic and Sanchez out. Not that I felt the former weren't going to do well, but I felt like I needed some points. Profit - more confidence, and hopefully, more future respectability. Who said it had to be financial profit?

I can see some peoples viewpoints here requesting that we make the game more of a fluctuating market with players prices rising and dropping based on performance. There are a few reasons why I feel it couldn't work, at least this year.

Firstly, it would change the entire attitude of the game away from site members trying to choose long-term solid quality players (as it is now), to people scouring the dregs of the leagues trying to find bargains for every single position. People would know that if they had a 3m player at the start in each position who went up in value, it doesn't really matter how they do for the first month because then they could sell them, spend whatever they earn from selling the players and buy Messi and Ronaldo for the rest of the game.

Secondly, it would be an absolutely massive overhead in work for the staff, re-evaluating every player for each transfer window. The knock on effect of missing a few bargain players would be huge and 90% of teams would snap them up when word got around the team forums. As it stands, if we underprice a player, it's not a huge deal. We have the option of bumping them up a little and not affecting anyone who has them already.

Finally, I think it would change the direction we try to make the game take. We don't aim for perfect realism, but we try to replicate a real league as much as possible. If a player breaks a leg, you should sell him and get in a replacement. You shouldn't be buying/selling a player because his price changed. It would almost become an agents game, not a managers game. Real life managers don't buy players at the start of a league with the intention of selling them in October.

Hope that goes some way to explain my own personal views on it

This is practically forcing us to stick with the players we originally bought.

Either the profits need to be implemented. Or more transfer spots are needed. Three spots is ridiculous when you're trying to upgrade a player.

I tried to get Rooney by selling three players and buying 2 cheap ones + Rooney. And I can't do it. Because I run out of transfer dealings.

Basically, everyone is pretty much stuck with the starting set. This is far from DreamFooty

Leave dream footy as it is don't need any changes.... Please