Barcelona vs Chelsea
April 28th, 2009 . posted by admin
UEFA Champions League Semi-finals
[rv]Barcelona vs Chelsea@Apr 28[/rv]
Rate this video:
Related Entries:
Barcelona 2-2 Chelsea|Chelsea 1-0 Barcelona|Chelsea Vs Barcelona|Related Videos: Champions League|Latest Highlights
BARCA | April 28th, 2009 @ 11:20 pm | | |
This game was really boring……..
I almost fell asleep….
chelseasux | April 28th, 2009 @ 11:37 pm | | |
chelsea rubbish. really feel bored to see them play.
gaytron | April 29th, 2009 @ 12:33 am | | |
I lost a bet i said barca was gonna win by more than 3 goals, now I have to be my friend's slave for 2 weeks and bow down to him in the nude :(
Josiah | April 29th, 2009 @ 12:55 am | | |
Chelsea played anti-football…
no ambition at all, AT LEAST 6+ players in the box all the time and sometimes more…
Barca played as they always do, created chances but really they can't be criticized as it is nearly impossible to score when a team is playing the way Chelsea do…
I give credit to Hiddink for his strategy as it did work, but I don't call it football…
that;s for sure
PeacefulWarrior | April 29th, 2009 @ 12:58 am | | |
I fell asleep in the 60 min lol and I dont regret it :D
PT | April 29th, 2009 @ 1:11 am | | |
Barcelona is finished. Another Chelsea, United final. Chelsea is the Champion this year.
the blues | April 29th, 2009 @ 1:44 am | | |
ivanovic and cech were gud!!!
yodude | April 29th, 2009 @ 1:51 am | | |
loser comment. made by chelsea supporter for sure
yodude | April 29th, 2009 @ 1:59 am | | |
i feel weird that there are chelsea supporters around. don't they feel disgraced by the way chelsea play? althought i am a rm supporter, i sympathize the way barcelona loss their previous encounter. they lose it cause chelsea cheat their way through. why isn't there any punishment when obviously chelsea fouled the goalkeeper. u don't hug the goalkeeper and not letting him move an inch. why isn't there any punishment given out? i do believe that fifa really do want to make epl prosper at the expense of other leagues. why izzit that there is more preference and hype for the english
jsg10 | April 29th, 2009 @ 2:20 am | | |
Before the game it was Messi Messi Messi….but the spanish media forgot whos the coach of Chelsea….Hiddink is a genius….call it watever football u like but Chelsea played well…Its the first time this season Barca have been prevented from scoring a goal at home…last time it was Man U at same stage of the CL…and its not easy to stop barca from scorin…even if u have 11 men in ur own half….why havent other teams done that ? I mean who wudnt want a 0-0 draw at camp nou ?
yodude | April 29th, 2009 @ 2:23 am | | |
other teams that play barcelona do play at least a little football unlike chelsea… COWARD and i repeat again COWARD. dun even deserve to be champion for any competition.
Barcelona Fan | April 29th, 2009 @ 3:28 am | | |
very sad… to watch such a powerful squad cower behind their own third… 11 men on the pitch and only one attacking.. i've seen 2nd division Spanish squads that come at Barca with more fortitude…
Webbo | April 29th, 2009 @ 4:15 am | | |
It was quite boring and frustrating… but that is what we were to expect from Chelsea, they know that they are outclassed in every section of the field except defense… Pique and Rafa a couple of times were quite scary!
But other then that, nothing new… Chelsea came to NOT lose, to NOT get clobbered, and to take a draw back home, nothing else, they hung all their players at the goal.. like bats, why? because that is the only way you can defeat a goal scoring machine like Barza.
The second leg will be interesting, a tie and Barza is through… so not really smart of Chelsea. Another factor to take into account is that Barza will have the Clasico this weekend, we'll see what they're made of by the end of next week…
ryman | April 29th, 2009 @ 4:28 am | | |
this is the champions league semis ppl.. its all abt TACTICS at this stage in the competiton n theres no1 better the guus hiddink at tht… give credit for the way cheslea defended… chelsea will come out on the attack more in stamford bridge… barca have serious problems now tht marquez is gone n puyol is suspended… there gona have to put a makeshhift cb nxt game n tht is gona b vry hard against a resurgent drogba.. god help barcas defense nxt leg!!!
xxx | April 29th, 2009 @ 4:32 am | | |
yodude ur so called barca is RIP ok u walky talky ,lol
xxx | April 29th, 2009 @ 4:38 am | | |
people talks abt sexy and attacking football only but defensive football and work also must be given credits ,2006 where italian won world cup ,who r known for defensive football ,and best playa was cannavaro who was defender himself ,so attack or sit deep and counter attack its a part of the game ,main is Result ,so RIP BARCA @ STAMFORD BRIDGE ,LOL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
BARCA | April 29th, 2009 @ 4:56 am | | |
I should've slept it…
BARCA | April 29th, 2009 @ 4:57 am | | |
you are finished..
yesssss | April 29th, 2009 @ 5:44 am | | |
well said mate. well said. you play with what you have. it's strategy. statistics show that barca ALWAYS score A LOT at nou camp no matter what team they play. so if u'r a good manager, you will try to minimize it by defends or if possible get a draw and then get a win at your home where supporters are behind ur back. of course it will backfire if barca score a lot at stamford bridge, but you have to gamble. now puyol and marquez is out. so it's possible chelsea can still win.
jose | April 29th, 2009 @ 10:19 am | | |
anyone who say chelsea is coward is just angry barca didnt score. the last 2 teams to stop barcelona scoring at nou camp are manchester and chelsea and liverpool have also beaten them twice at nou camp. english teams are the best in the world because they can do things lilke this. it is not impossible to score when a team parks the bus, yesterday barcelona were just not good enough to score. 0-0 is not good result for either team because now every goal scored by barca will be away goal but chelsea will be playing at stamford bridge so it will be very interesting match.
Liverpool Red | April 29th, 2009 @ 11:16 am | | |
lol, u always bet to bow down to ur friend nude? :D
Ja | April 29th, 2009 @ 12:30 pm | | |
Job well done Chelsea. Who cares if they didn't score or play some 'beautiful attacking football.' that wasn't the mission coming into this tie. it was a test to see how strong our defense was and they held out pretty well. Barca didn't score and thats that.
Hopefully there will be more goals at the Bridge next week. and a formation change as well with Kalou or Anelka partnering Drogba upfront.
yodude | April 29th, 2009 @ 12:59 pm | | |
u must be a chelski fan, LOSER!! even if chelski win they lose my respect and chelsea fans r still loser while if chelsea lose, u r still counted as a loser. so no matter wat u r a LOSER
yodude | April 29th, 2009 @ 1:04 pm | | |
stop giving excuses for ur team. i do remember that jose complaining that other team park bus in front of their goal. y izzit that chelski can complain that totterham park bus in front of the goal and yet chelski do the same. with such an expensive team, can chelski really play football or y not juz go home and play with their balls(if they happen to have)
boundtoramble | April 29th, 2009 @ 1:10 pm | | |
People admire this Barça team, because they're one of the few teams that play, like you said, sexy and attacking football. Sure, we should give credit to good defensive football, but that's nothing new. There are lots of teams that play defensive football. Italy won the World Cup playing defensive football, Greece won the Euro 2004, Liverpool were also a highly defensive team when they won the CL. But i prefer attacking football, i think everybody does! But it seems like Chelsea played like a 2nd rate team, with no ambition. They could at least tried to get an away goal. It seems like they can only play good defensively if they completely give out on attack, or else they will concede 4 goals like against Liverpool or the 3 against Bolton. They can't seem to be able to play good attacking and defensive football in the same match, it's only one or the other.
yodude | April 29th, 2009 @ 1:10 pm | | |
i am not a chelsea fan firstly but i was shocked that chelsea is able to get out lots of punishment. quite sad that the referee is threatened with death. they dive a lot but is there any punishment to punish them, no. they glorify themself when they should be disgrace
Barcelona Fan | April 29th, 2009 @ 3:41 pm | | |
AH and one more thing…. Boswinga CLEARLY pulled Henry away from the ball… blatant penalty.. but they were letting play go on throughtout the match… Ballack should've ben carded… marquez is gone and puyol will miss the next let(GOOD… cuz lord know we're gonna need him in the final)
free bet | April 29th, 2009 @ 5:07 pm | | |
Barca can still qualify, its all up to Chelsea to not loose at home….
tangomango | April 29th, 2009 @ 6:35 pm | | |
I don't get it.
Although as a Chelsea fan, I was very surprised with their tactic. But this cannot be called cheap or any of that sort. It's a tactic to play against a good team, what more can be said?
The only way I can see people bashing is because Barca fans thought this was going to be an easy win and even the predictors were saying 'It will be a 3-1,' 'It will be 2-1,' 'It will be 4-2.' However, Chelsea came out to be a smarter team and countered the amazing strikers Barca had. What more can be said?
If Barca was truly as unstoppable as some of you say, then why did they not score?
tangomango | April 29th, 2009 @ 6:37 pm | | |
Italy in 2006 WC played many of their matches as a VERY defensive team.
You need to change the style of play and keep your opponents wondering. It's common sense. But then again, this is the internet and many people don't have such a thing.
hola | April 29th, 2009 @ 7:43 pm | | |
u made a fat mistake,barcelona will reach the final.just started counting d days from 2day
footyfan | April 29th, 2009 @ 8:44 pm | | |
I agree – whatever Chelsea did they did. The point isn't to play beautiful football – it's to WIN beautifully – show the rest of the world that you can win even while making the game look beautiful.
I really hope for the sake of football that Barcelona win on Wednesday.
jose | April 29th, 2009 @ 11:15 pm | | |
im am not a chelsea fan so wat u said is a obbviously a lie, i wanted barca to win but they didnt deserve it. this is a 2 match tie, so teams deploy different tactics, barca's goal was to score and chelsea's was to stop them and they did. if this was a cup final of course chelsea would attack more but calling them cowards is just stupid because they are a very strong team.
jose | April 29th, 2009 @ 11:16 pm | | |
at the end of the day winning is winning. people dont remember how a champion did it but they remember that they did it.
mikeymikey | April 29th, 2009 @ 11:46 pm | | |
Those of you who are bitching at Chelsea simply do not understand football tactics. Guess what, despite what you think, the object of sport is to WIN, not to provide entertainment. If the goal was the latter then sure, each team can put all their stock in offence and we'll have a 7-5 scoreline. All you with ADD can then cheer…
But this is not the point. The point is to win, and if you are Chelsea the only way to win to prevent Barca from scoring. And how do you stop the best attacking team from putting 3 or 4 away? You play defence, get a draw or a win (from the one or two chances you inevitabely will get), go back home and try to beat them on your home turf. That is simply commonsense, and the fact that Chelsea was about to pretty much prevent any scoring chances from happening shows their class, their skill, their organization and their focus. Sure it was not a goal-a-minute game, and yes I admit it was dry at times, but I thought it was amazing football. Anyone who understands soccer would appreciate the organization of Chelsea. Only goons with little understanding of tactics would get as riled up as half of you are.
Besides, Drogba almost scored, should scored. Can you imagine if he did, and Chelsea won 1-0, how much Guus' tactics would be praised. Chelsea did what any team should do if they want a chance at beating Barca – neutralize their offence and hope that one of your chances finds the net.
Good and Chelsea and looking forward to next week.
boundtoramble | April 30th, 2009 @ 12:20 am | | |
Barça didn't deserve to win?! Who the hell did then? You have to attack and score to win, and Chelsea didn't do that. Barça attack and had some chances, so they did deserve to win. Chelsea defended well, but that doesn't mean that Barça didn't deserve to win, so don't say that.
Hitokiri | April 30th, 2009 @ 12:22 am | | |
I know what happened to Marquez…. It was the swine flu…
ronaldinhofan | April 30th, 2009 @ 12:27 am | | |
mikeymikey i totally agree with what u said. i dont just agree with you saying the point of sport is not to entertain. ofcourse it IS to entertain. if it wasnt to entertain you think people would pay good money to see a bunch of guys playing a game to win? football is entertaining. thats why its watched by EVERYONE. but the reason they have prizes like the UCL is to encourage players to try harder to be even MORE entertaining. i hope by ur comment u didnt mean football wasnt entertaining. apart from this, u are definetly right. chelsea did what they had to do, to have a chance against mighty barca in camp nou.
Liverpool | April 30th, 2009 @ 12:50 am | | |
Lucky didnt waste 90 mins to watch this match.hahas. If liverpool play like that, surely i won't watch it too.
ANTI-yodude | April 30th, 2009 @ 12:56 am | | |
shut up yodude.. Just because Real madrid sux!! doesn't mean you have to criticise other teams.. Chelsea and Barcelona played a great game.. Chelsea's strategy to play defensive was brilliant and barcelona's attacks are great.. So stop criticising about their match and go support your loser club..
ANTI-yodude | April 30th, 2009 @ 12:58 am | | |
Shut yodude.. Real Madrid sux!! Chelsea and barcelona played their best (even though it was a boring match).. So stop criticising them and go support your loser club..
yodude | April 30th, 2009 @ 1:05 am | | |
u r a loser. chelsea only chance is due to barcelona mistake. for u, u dun know wat is football. football is not tennis and tennis is not football u loser.chelsea is damn lucky to escape with a draw and the gulf between the two side is huge. the way chelsea play doesn't deserve any recognition. if u feel that football should not be entertaining, u should not treat it as an entertainment. so dun watch it.
yodude | April 30th, 2009 @ 1:13 am | | |
u are the one that need to shut up. chelsea is lucky that they even have supporters that are willing to fork out money for their club.the way that they act is disgraceful. at least real madrid serve to entertain not like chelsea that is sssssoooooo boring. if u look at previous comments, most of them say that this is a lousy match and dun deserve to waste their time. i have to agree. the way chelsea play is disgusting and stop wasting ur time on loser chelsea club.
heard that they are replacing the picture of the chelsea badge with a genital pic. a much more suitable badge rite.LOSER CLUB
beautifulgame | April 30th, 2009 @ 1:28 am | | |
can't believe that chelsea is supposedly a previous epl champion. the gameplan is the hallmark of a loser not a champion. they really wasted my sleep with their showing. can't believe that there are people out there who support chelsea. they keep glorifying their defensive style and keeping saying that they are up there with the elite. TOTAL RUBBISH. Abramovich sack jose for wat, boring team.
Why not juz support bolton and praise them to the sky. is there any difference? at least they didn't refute the way they play as boring and they are a much more down to earth bunch of guys. (not as much diving and cheaters as compared)
Penice ;) | April 30th, 2009 @ 1:30 am | | |
watch manj move to chelsea u dno manj!!!!
beautifulgame | April 30th, 2009 @ 1:31 am | | |
chelsea is lucky to escape with a draw and i have to admit that chelsea is the lousiest side that i have seen in term of playing style. they can't even create chance for themselve and have to rely on mistakes of other side to have a half decent chance. they are pretty lousy
liverpool_4_lyf_23q | April 30th, 2009 @ 1:33 am | | |
bro what? manj go to chelsea. pffffft alright mate :S
how boring was that game ay! liverpool shuda been there. they would have shown barca!
penice ;) | April 30th, 2009 @ 1:34 am | | |
what? i said u dno manj. hence u dno bro shut ur throat with a teaspoon jagielka bro jimmy floyed that out yo peice!!!!
danman | April 30th, 2009 @ 1:56 am | | |
at least the old Chelsea squads had some self respect and won these ties like a big club. many of these players were on the team that actually scored two goals against Barcelona at Camp Nou, and now they come cowering in front of their own goal. how pathetic!
Keenan | April 30th, 2009 @ 1:56 am | | |
CHELSEA PLAYS ANTI FOOTBALL
DISGRACE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ANTI ANTI-yodude | April 30th, 2009 @ 1:58 am | | |
chelsea sux loser club. and u r really a loser to support them
chelskisux | April 30th, 2009 @ 2:01 am | | |
chelsea is the lowest form in the universe. welcome loser of the loser club
lousiest club ever | April 30th, 2009 @ 2:02 am | | |
at least real madrid is still an entertaining side and if real madrid play like this, hiddink will surely be sacked. real madrid dun play dirty and dun go all out to hurt others. if ur team is inferior, u should not play like a coward(hide in their shell or in this case, half). chelsea is lucky that they even have a scoring opportunity that they have to rely on others and can't even create themselves. real madrid win games but did people disrespect them the way people look down on chelsea, NO. they serve to entertain not like chelsea who have the cheek to praise themselves for the way they play. football serve to entertain not disgrace.
mikeymikey | April 30th, 2009 @ 2:07 am | | |
Of course soccer is meant to be entertaining. But what I meant is, clubs, before a match, do not think, “what tactics could we use to be the most entertaining club”…No, they pure and simply think, “what tactics could we use to WIN”. That is what I meant, that the raison d'etre of football, and all sport, is to win. The entertainment aspect is a byproduct. It is the sole responsibility of clubs, and thus their managers, to organize a team based on what will give them the greatest chance of victory.
The rest is not directed to you, but in the case of Chelsea vs Barca, obviously the only chance Chelsea have to nuetralize Barca's attack. This, because of Barca's potent offence, requires extreme defending. So be it. It works. Does anyone else out there not appreciate the organization of the Chelsea defence? Most clubs try the very same thing Chelsea did yesterday but still get 3 or 4 goals scored against them. No one bitches about them because they still get scored on. That Chelsea was successful in preventing goals I found very entertaining, and I think most people who know football would agree. A well organized team is a treat to watch as well, but only if you understand football…
mikeymikey | April 30th, 2009 @ 2:12 am | | |
The point of soccer, and all sport, is to achieve victory. To do so teams play to their strengths and try to eliminate their opponent's. If Chelsea played a 3-4-3 open attacking style they probably would have lost. Knowing that why would any thinking person do so? Just because people like you who have no understanding of the subtlies of the game have no attention span? Chelsea played great and put themselves in a great position for the return leg. If you were Chelsea's manager, would you knowingly sacrifice your team's chances – aka set your team up to lose – just for the sake of “entertainment”?
PS – grow up. No need to use personal insults every sentence. We're discussing football tactics, not your mom, for crying out loud…
jose | April 30th, 2009 @ 11:20 am | | |
barca fans say chelsea didnt come to win, which is true. barca dominated the game and had about 70% posession yet they couldnt score. doesnt that show how bad barcelona was, that they dominate a game but they only create a few chances and in the end hand a chance to drogba who should have scored.
jose | April 30th, 2009 @ 11:26 am | | |
yodude i think you are so sad to change your name to “beautifulgame” then “ANTI ANTI-yodude then “chelskisux” and “lousiest club ever”. u try to make it look likepeople are on your side but instead u embarrass yourself and look like a moron LOL.
boundtoramble | April 30th, 2009 @ 12:37 pm | | |
Huh… how do you win then? I thought it was by scoring goals…
Barça aren't going to change their mentality for the away game, they're still going to play attacking football. And they know how to play attacking football and still play good defensively. The thing with using good defensive tactics, is that if you're a 2nd rate team it's KINDA ok to forget completely about the attack like Chelsea did. But Chelsea isn't a 2nd rate team, and whereas some people say that they approached the game with Barça humbly, i'll say that they approached it with lack of ambition. They just defended and didn't try to counter-attack (Kalou or Anelka could've played since they're quick players, for example) and get an important away goal. The one chance they got was just a mistake by Marquez. Now i think they're gonna have to win the home game, because a draw with goals isn't enough. So Chelsea are gonna have to attack more, leaving the defense more vulnerable this time. And Liverpool scored 4 goals at Stamford Bridge, so what makes people think that Barça isn't capable of that?
me | April 30th, 2009 @ 1:30 pm | | |
So you cant stop a team with pure defence.. so you result to mafia football? BLATANT elbows and malicious tackles..
its funny how Platini complains about english dominance but turn a blind eye to games like this..
hell even united didnt result to such horrid tactics…. (yes they defended.. but 20 fouls… and SOOO many missed yellows.. boswinga pull was a penalty..a and the list goal on… Mikel tackles like an ingrate mongrol…. and surprisingly ESSIEN of all people played a clean game
yodude | April 30th, 2009 @ 3:50 pm | | |
look at all the insults chelsea got in this site. izzit all done by me?? no, u have to accept that there are anti chelski fans around and rm supporter around u loser. do i have to gather votes, judging by chelski performance, no. they r a dirty side n u are dumb
s7ven | April 30th, 2009 @ 3:54 pm | | |
barcelona is off form but isn't it bad enough that chelsea have to use roughhouse antics to stop barca. it's ok with defensive game but if u r stepping over the line like chelsea did, there should be punishment around.
jose | April 30th, 2009 @ 4:33 pm | | |
If your going to speak english please spell correctly. Everyone here has just seen how childish you are by pretending to be other people by changing your name. Stop trying to justify that by saying you're not the only chelsea hater, of course everbody is not a chelsea fan but what you did was totally pathetic and an embarrassment to barcelona fans. i know im not the only one laughing at you for acting so childish lol.
tangomango | April 30th, 2009 @ 4:33 pm | | |
I love the internet.
Most of the people here are the most uneducated people I have ever heard on the internet.
jose | April 30th, 2009 @ 4:37 pm | | |
oh and you say real madrid is an entertaining side? many liverpool fans certainly were entertained when they beat beat madrid at the bernebau using the same tactic as chelsea and then went on to run riot on them at anfield, while the most prolific scorer in the champions league, Raul, never even came close to scoring.
Ebeneezer_Goode | April 30th, 2009 @ 9:20 pm | | |
Why wasn't there any punishment for Barca's persistent and frankly pathetic diving? There's no shame in playing defensively against Barca in the Nou Camp with the attacking talent they've got and the form they're in, but there's is absolutley NO excuse for diving, Barca fans should be ashamed, Alves was an absolute embarrassment.
Ebeneezer_Goode | April 30th, 2009 @ 9:24 pm | | |
Football doesn't work like that, the scoreline is what decides games, not how attacking either team were. Chelsea couldn't score, but neither could Barca, so neither deserved to win, and the scoreline was a fair one.
ex-Chelseafan | April 30th, 2009 @ 10:26 pm | | |
The way chelsea was fouling..lol. The way chelsea was playing.. lol.
Barca WILL score. Whether in the game or during penalties. This is a good result for barca.
anti-violence | April 30th, 2009 @ 10:26 pm | | |
i disagree. y izzit ppl keeping saying that chelsea is at an advantage. the score is still 0-0. defensive football is ugly but i expected that from chelsea. but it is horrible that they have the intention to go for the man not the ball. dislike chelsea for their conduct and they way they get out of any punishment.
JT legend, leader & blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:09 am | | |
Barca suck. If they were that good they would score. and plus we weren't even in an attacking formation to begin with idiot. 4-5-1 is not attack minded. we would've played 4-3-3. no Kalou, Anelka etc…
JT legend, leader & blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:10 am | | |
haha we'll see. they'll get destroyed at the bridge i'm sure
JT legend, leader & blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:13 am | | |
well said man. Guus knows what hes doing.
JT legend, leader & blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:13 am | | |
lol
JT legend, leader & blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:15 am | | |
idiot what the hell was Barca 0-0 Man utd last year? tactics mate.
JT legend, leader & blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:16 am | | |
ex-chelsea fan, what a disgrace. we are gonna win the champions league. and you'll see.
JT legend, leader & blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:20 am | | |
haha i guess everyone on here got short term memory or something. REMEMBER BARCA 0-0 MAN UTD LAST YEAR? i guess not. idiots. retards.
JT legend, leader & blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:21 am | | |
BARCA 0-0 MAN UTD 2008, MAN UTD wins the CL. it happened already.
JT legend, leader & blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:21 am | | |
haha another scouser angry cos his team got smacked 2wice in a row. jajaja
JT legend, leader & blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:23 am | | |
Guadriola made a huge mistake bringing on Puyol cos if he got booked he would miss the return leg. should've stayed on the bench.
JT legend, leader & blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:25 am | | |
there would've been Anelka instead of Mikel idiot. 4-5-1 is not attacking formation. go learn about football.
JT legend, leader & blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:27 am | | |
you suck
Jotham | May 1st, 2009 @ 1:57 am | | |
Chelsea fans be disgraced. Chelsea is just playing pure dirty. How can Chelsea play so dirty yet receive same number of cards as Barca. I think the refree is quite rich after that match.
Did you see how the defender pull Henry down when Henry was obviously in the penalty box yet what was the refree doing? Flying Kite? Obviously either the refree is dumb or he is bribed.
Chelsea ought to be ashamed of themselves, they disgrace soccer. If Chelsea were to be a drama serial it would be “UGLY BETTY” UGLY CHELSEA!
boundtoramble | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:22 pm | | |
That's why he didn't begin the match you dumbass. But with the injury to Marquez who should he have brought in? And since Milito is also injured the only other centre back that Barça have is Caceres who wasn't even on the bench.
boundtoramble | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:24 pm | | |
Yeah, 'cause it's so hard to score goals at Stamford Bridge when Chelsea isn't defending with 10 players. Just ask Liverpool and Bolton, they got destroyed, right? And they're better teams than Barça, right?
boundtoramble | May 1st, 2009 @ 12:27 pm | | |
Hey dumbass, how ya doing? And if Chelsea were any good they would try to at least make ONE coherent attack. Which they didn't. Because they suck. And they will suck at Stamford Bridge. The fact that Cech was man of the match just says it all really. lol
ChelseaFC | May 1st, 2009 @ 2:02 pm | | |
All you guys saying that Chelsea played coward, didn't play football..etc.etc. ar talking nonsense. Is defending not part of football? Its just a tactic they were playing. Use your brains and think before saying nonsense like that. Yes I'm a Chelsea supporter and I'm happy about the way they played.
JT legend, leader & Blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 4:33 pm | | |
Barca are a bunch of pu**sy divers.
JT legend, leader & Blue 4 eva | May 1st, 2009 @ 4:35 pm | | |
Does anyone remember Barca 0-0 Man Utd last season? who progressed to the final huh?
jose | May 2nd, 2009 @ 12:07 am | | |
Difference is manchester is better team then chelsea and barcelona was worse team last season. 0-0 is hardly good for chelsea considering u will have to attack and keeping clean sheet is even more important.
jerk referee | May 2nd, 2009 @ 4:54 pm | | |
sometimes i do feel that some referee have the intention to help certain team. this is a match that prove my point. barcelona didn't score but the referee did help chelsea get away with everything they did. they display poor, underhand tackle and lousy sportmanship. if the referee is a decent one, chelsea may lose the tie if they can't play dirty. Congrats referee, u r pretty lousy
pathetic game | May 2nd, 2009 @ 4:57 pm | | |
attacking is also part of football. judging by your comment, chelsea played foot instead of football.
dream on | May 2nd, 2009 @ 4:59 pm | | |
it is good to dream but don't dream too much
dream on | May 2nd, 2009 @ 6:57 pm | | |
i don't like the way chelsea played. damn disgusting and dirty. i have nothing with tackle if it is fair but the tackle in this game is absolutely shitty. keep an eye on ur club, do u have to defend them even if they are in the worng
dream on | May 2nd, 2009 @ 7:05 pm | | |
puyol should act smarter in that game. maquez injured himself and puyol should stay clear of the cards instead.
barca to go through for all chelsea fans. they are now playing away and will get the away goal. REFEREE, DO YOUR JOB. You helped chelsea in the 1st leg but do it one more time and i hope that you will regret it ( maybe caught for throwing the match)
real | May 2nd, 2009 @ 7:13 pm | | |
we loss to liverpool and i'll admit that we played badly, was off form. but is there any terrrible challenge, no rite. the tactic by liverpool and chelsea is different. liverpool played deep but not so overly-defensive as compared to chelsea. furthermore there is a foul in one of the goal. i still admire liverpool as overall they played football not gangfight or coward-type-sneak- ugly tackle
i'm your teacher | May 2nd, 2009 @ 7:17 pm | | |
funny about your comment. write or type english not speak. correct yourself before typing out. there are loads of people out there using short forms, u are using 'lol' rite.
rubbishfc | May 2nd, 2009 @ 7:19 pm | | |
judging by your answer, chelsea play foot instead of football since the other part,attack was not shown at all.
h | May 3rd, 2009 @ 3:36 am | | |
crazy
desmon | May 6th, 2009 @ 9:31 am | | |
Barcelona Vs Chelsea
Hasil Semi Final Liga Champion Eropa terbaru Barcelona vs Chelsea adalah 0-0. Hasil semi final Liga Champion Barcelona vs Chelsea tidak sama dengan prediksi hasil Barcelona vs Chelsea saya. Hasil Barcelona vs Chelsea ini di bawah harapan saya.
Padahal menurut saya pribadi, Barcelona musim ini sangat spektakuler dibandingkan Chelsea, tapi apa boleh buat itulah Sepak Bola… tidak bisa diprediksi sebelumnya, kadang tepat kadang juga meleset.
Saya berharap adanya pesta gol di pertandingan tersebut, tapi mungkin karena pertandingan ini adalah pertandingan semi final Liga Champions leg pertama, jadi Barcelona dan Chelsea bermain hati-hati dan permainan Chelsea pun cenderung bertahan, ketimbang Barcelona yang terus MENGGEMPUR barisan pertahanan Chelsea, yang habis-habisan bertahan demi tidak kebobolan 1 GOL.
Dengan hasil Semi Final Liga Champion Barcelona melawan Chelsea ini, maka Barcelona pun harus meraih minimal hasil seri 1-1, atau bahkan menang di Stamford Bridge, dan Chelsea pun harus menang di pertandingan semi final Liga Champions leg 2 kalau ingin mengulang suksesnya di musim lalu, dimana Chelsea berhasil untuk pertama kalinya menembus Final Liga Champion dalam sejarah Club tersebut.
Tapi, secara pribadi.. terus terang saya mendukung Barcelona untuk menjadi juara musim ini, karena memang kita melihat penampilan anak asuh dari Joseph Guardiola ini, sangat mengagumkan.. di kancah DOMESTIK atau di kancah LIGA CHAMPIONS.
juaraDi perempat Final Liga Champions aja Barcelona menghajar habis-habisan Raksasa Jerman Bayern Munich dengan agregat 5-1, untuk itu harapan saya Barcelona bisa mengulangi suksesnya di tahun 2006 dimana Club tersebut berhasil Menjuarai Liga Champions Eropa untuk kedua kalinya dalam sejarah Club tersebut.
Nah, mungkin itu saja Ulasan dari saya pribadi.. mungkin bagi para pembaca ada yang mau ditambahkan, apalagi kalau bagi PENGGILA BOLA (seperti saya.. hehehe… :D ), dan semoga besok hasil MU vs Arsenal lebih baik daripada hasil Liga Champion Barcelona vs Chelsea. Jangan lupa besok subuh, nonton pertadingan kedua semi final UEFA Champions League. OK!!!