Lille 0-1 Man United
February 20th, 2007 . posted by admin
A hotly-disputed Ryan Giggs free-kick gave Manchester United a 1-0 win away to Lille as the match ended in chaos. Giggs's 83rd-minute effort was taken before the referee's whistle, prompting a farcical attempt from Lille to leave the field in protest.
Click here to watch Ferguson's post match interview + player/staff brawl + Lille's disallowed goal and more…
Rate this video:
Related Entries:
Man United v OSC Lille|Lille to welcome United to Lens|Lille and Manchester United fined|Related Videos: Champions League|Latest Highlights|Highlights|Lille|Manchester United
ogami | February 20th, 2007 @ 7:21 pm | | |
Shame on giggs…
Red Lion | February 20th, 2007 @ 8:58 pm | | |
Well, they had their wall up.
georgeyaj | February 20th, 2007 @ 9:31 pm | | |
very nice
R3Dd3vil | February 20th, 2007 @ 10:19 pm | | |
i don’t understand the controversy…..GO LOOK UP THE LAWS OF THE GAME!!! once the referee does not instruct the player to wait on the whistle AND he (the ref) walks away it is perfectly legal to take the kick – the opposition’s wall is their business – if they want to take 10 mins. to organize it then they pay the price…
>
Robert Moon | February 20th, 2007 @ 11:06 pm | | |
its all legal, but man i wish they would have won differently.
Fifa Laws of the Game | February 20th, 2007 @ 11:24 pm | | |
Laws of the game allow it–Ref acknowledges, and strides off. It is clever, wily, and the mark of a veteran footballer in a level of competition where taking that long to build a wall looks like a bunch of 12 year olds out on the youth pitch. A legal win is a legal win. Nobody claims it’s pretty.
aa | February 20th, 2007 @ 11:25 pm | | |
thats the only way man utd wins…
aa | February 20th, 2007 @ 11:26 pm | | |
GROW SOME BALLS MAN UTD…U BUNCH OF WANKERS
daniel | February 21st, 2007 @ 12:49 am | | |
Don’t need balls, it’s in the back of the net.
Tom | February 21st, 2007 @ 2:35 am | | |
Thanks for the clip- just finished a night shift and trying all the TV channels to no avail!
I agree with comment 6.
Comment 8 man obviously a bitter Chelsea fan.
yukiman | February 21st, 2007 @ 3:08 am | | |
man utd is the best team on earth!!! no1 can beat man utd!! nice goal ryan giggs!!! “what a sensational goal by ryan giggs!!!”
Yanno | February 21st, 2007 @ 3:14 am | | |
There’s no controversy at all. Perfectly taken free kick with a wall not properly set up… too bad for Lille, but as far as Manu is concerned, it’s a legal win.
It’s actually a shame that Lille was about to boycott the rest of the game…. What a disgrace for our great sport.
Bastairteile | February 21st, 2007 @ 4:39 am | | |
Perfectly good goal.
With all the comments I’ve read so far, how come nobody has mentioned Henry doing EXACTLY the same thing? Was there this much of an uproar when that happened? I’m not sure but I think it was against villa. Were people saying “shame on Henry” like another poster above back then? Of course not. There is an unwritten rule in football – “When the ball goes dead, you come alive” and thats what happened last night. Lille committed the foul, why should the ref give them an advantage by waiting for them to set up the wall after that? You’re supposed to be punished after a foul, Lille were just punished in the harshest way. Thats football, live with it.
phil | February 21st, 2007 @ 5:08 am | | |
you twats it was a perfectly legal goal. talk about the babies who were walking off in a sulk!!\:d/
kbm | February 21st, 2007 @ 5:33 am | | |
I’m not a Man Divided fan nor Lille… but it’s all legit. Divided deserve the win
David - D | February 21st, 2007 @ 6:00 am | | |
Absolute disgrace – if it had been a quick free kick the wall would never have had time to form. As soon as the Lille players think it is a direct free kick they would expect the ref to BLOW HIS WHISTLE to inform BOTH SETS OF TEAMS – NOT JUST MAN U SCUM – that the game is restarting.
So what did the ref and Giggs say to each other ? ‘go on Ryan, take the free kick I know its not a quick one and I know the goalie is still lining up his wall but this will be an easy goal for you…. especially hepful after I’ve already disallowed one of theirs’
This is disgrace and brings into question the whole legitmacy of the game no wonder Lille wanted to walk off – you’re never going to win when you are playing against the referee.
mel | February 21st, 2007 @ 6:17 am | | |
if it’s not against d rules.. so why not then? good goal i definitely say.. smart move! u gotta use ur damn brains sometimes to win a tough match .. not juz by skills..
and i’m very sure many teams do play like that once in awhile..
this is at least better than diving for penalty..
you’re juz jealous that manchester won.. if it’s ur fav team who scored that goal like that; i think u’ll be defending him..
PLay d game beautifully with BRAINS too.. !
And yea.. i hate it when they take ages to score free kicks.. many many players including henry lampard have done it b4..
Scotafella | February 21st, 2007 @ 6:19 am | | |
Utd win, cause we slugged it out on a crap pitch with crap Lille fans throwing missles and playing against crappy babies who walk off pitches when they go one down!
Anybody saying there is a problem with Giggsy’s goal don’t know nothing bout football, its in the rulebook ya stupid idiots! People all over Europe have been scoring free-kicks like this for years.
There is NO excuse for walking off the pitch during a game, did the england team walk off when Maradonna punched in a goal in the World Cup….NO because we’re real men! Bunch of cowards.
I’m going to the 2nd leg at Old Trafford, any Lille fans with a problem then, come find me……
Ps. Big up to ‘daniel’ and his reply to ‘aa’ comments. Oh and ‘David D’ get a life, you sound like a right chump/scouser! ha \:d/
c0latine | February 21st, 2007 @ 6:27 am | | |
MAN U is really a dirty team that i ever seen … same as Arsenal …. Soccer is a beautiful game that everyone enjoy and both these team had ruin the beauty of the game.
I agree with the comment 16 where the ref is on the MAN U side …… !!!
vidhyesh | February 21st, 2007 @ 6:27 am | | |
well its legal when the french do it n not legal when the brits do it ? ? ? ? ? ? (henry) wat a bunch of sore losers the french are……
lunarkin | February 21st, 2007 @ 6:34 am | | |
What a sizzling shot!!!!!!
Giggs just hammered the goal right in the corner!!!
Literally blew the leather off the ball!!!
give credit where it’s deserved!!!
There’s no chance in hell that the keeper would have stopped it ready or not.
Matt | February 21st, 2007 @ 6:44 am | | |
sorry for my essay but people like COMMENT 16 clearly need this spelling out for them. how many times do you see players awarded free kicks deep in their own half and they quickly stop the ball with their hand and knock it on to the next player?? the answer is all the time as they do not have to wait for a whistle from the ref. the only time you have to wait for the whistle other than when the ref directly asks you to is if the ref measures the ten yards between the dead ball and the opposing wall. most refs will do that only when the team thats been awarded the kick asks for the ten yards. so, as for your comment about the game restarting, it never actually stopped, because the ref didn’t have to mark the ten yards. anyone who actually PLAYS football knows this, including the Lille goalkeeper. in short, this is merely a quick mental lapse by a professional team. This is actually why you will see some players stand directly in front of a newly awarded free kick in some games, it is so that the other team asks for the ten yards, thus stopping the game. This then gives the defending goalkeeper the time to line up a wall before the ref then
“BLOWS HIS WHISTLE to inform BOTH SETS OF TEAMS – NOT JUST MAN U SCUM that the game is restarting”
because, COMMENT 16, in that situation the game has actually stopped. As for your stupid comment 16 about the disallowed goal all you have to do is watch the replay, the Lille striker shoves Vidic in order to gain a positional advantage to score. I’m amazed the ref managed to see it but the problem for all the haters is that the camera managed to see it too. If Lille had’ve scored the same free kick against Man u would i be upset? YES. of course, that is a terrible way to lose a game of such magnitude but i would be upset at van der saar not the referee, and certainly not the other team merely cuz they were paying more attention than my own team decided to.
John | February 21st, 2007 @ 6:47 am | | |
i thnk giggs should of waited until the wall and the kepper are ready, however even if they were ready giggs would of scored a more beautiful than he jus did yesturday so lille are lucky he took a quick one.\:d/
John | February 21st, 2007 @ 6:49 am | | |
GLORIOUSE MAN UTD GLORIOUSE MAN UTD GLORIOUSE MAN UTD GLORIOUSE MAN UTD
THEY BEAT LILLE AND THEY COULDNT TAKE IT
HAAAHAAA
Scotafella | February 21st, 2007 @ 6:51 am | | |
YES, YES, YES! Matt makes a fine point doesn’t he! Guess thats the differnce between someone who plays football (ie.comment22) and someone that don’t know SH*T!(comment 16&19).
Anyone else who is gonna say this goal shouldn’t stand, don’t bother cos ya only proving what we’re saying.
Matt | February 21st, 2007 @ 6:52 am | | |
sorry but i just had to add this because of ‘aa’s comment 7. thats the only way we win??!!! buddy, i’m pretty sure the dominating figure of +45 in the goal difference column has something to do with the way Man u win.
Tom | February 21st, 2007 @ 7:33 am | | |
I think Giggs’ goal was as intelligent and as clever as the one where ronaldhino placed it underneath the jumping wall. The ref was ready for the game to carry on so why cant u guys just take it on the chin, or uhh…. in the back of the net. And also nice comment No. 26, that +45 goal difference surely says something
vena | February 21st, 2007 @ 8:01 am | | |
well..me too, I wish they had won differently..
bedo | February 21st, 2007 @ 8:46 am | | |
From the start of the video it seems ref actually encourages (or let me even say -instructs-) Giggs to take the shot. Look at his arms… It seems to say; “Go ahead, take it.” :D
Dim the Chelsea fan | February 21st, 2007 @ 9:17 am | | |
who cares about Man Utd. Chelsea will win it in the end. You ll see. Power to the Mighty Blues
1st place, goal difference | February 21st, 2007 @ 9:31 am | | |
Dim the Chesea Fan? Seems to describe your chances, DIM. How many games to play? How many points ahead are United? What’s the goal difference? It’s lights out, with the Blues feeling the Blues.
Kees | February 21st, 2007 @ 10:22 am | | |
Frank de Boer, EURO 2000, group stage, Netherlands – France. Same thing, Lama never saw it comming
Joe D | February 21st, 2007 @ 10:42 am | | |
Definitely a legal goal. When a team taking the free kick asks for 10 yards, the referee will hold the whistle up and point to it clearly so that both teams know play will restart on the whistle. Man U did not ask for 10, and the referee never signaled a restart on the whistle, thus goal stands.
Lille themselves are at fault for not positioning a player right in front of the ball to prevent a quick kick. Furthermore, the referee showed restraint by not carding, as allowed under the Laws of the Game, the several Lille players who left the field without the “permission of the referee.”
CYK | February 21st, 2007 @ 12:04 pm | | |
I wished Man Utd had won the game differently. Imagine Lille doing the same thing at Old trafford to Man Utd, knowing Sir Alex Fergusson and Man Utd fans, I’m sure the atmosphere will be more electrified compared to what we saw at Lille. Man Utd won already the game, but Man Utd fans need to be at least fair. This game is a beautiful one, we need to avoid this kind of frustration.
David - D | February 21st, 2007 @ 12:33 pm | | |
It seems to me the Giggs and the ref colluded, if you look at the pictures he was actually shooting into an empty net !!
never heard of this ask for ten yards rule that Man U fans seem to have conveniently created, but surely the mere fact that Lille had formed a wall tells everyone that Man United were going to take the ten yards.
Does this mean that every time there is a direct free kick in and around the bx the team defending have to wait till the opposition say they want ten yards….. bollox !!! As soon as the wall has formed the time for a quick free kick has passed.
So Comment 22 if the Scum player had been fouled got up and taken the kcik and put it in the net that would have been fine.
This is the referee and Manu U colluding and stetching the rules to gain an advantage. This may not have been so bad had the referee not disallowed the goal earlier
This IS BLATANT CHEATING and the fact that the referee was involved to help makes it even more disgusting
Rather win F*ck all than have to have referees helping the team get results.
Need I remind you about ths Spurs goal that was disallowed because it had supposedly hadn’t crossed the line. U Man U fans are g*llible twats The authorities know that Man U without success will drown in a mountain of debt cos all you glory seekers would just disappear.
lunarkin | February 21st, 2007 @ 12:38 pm | | |
SO DAVID-D, UM….D FOR DIKHEAD…..LAY OFF THE BLUE PILLS, YOU NEARLY STABBED ME IN THE EYE WITH THAT NOB….
Bastairteile | February 21st, 2007 @ 12:57 pm | | |
Henry has done this before twice:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/chelsea/4091217.stm
http://www.rte.ie/sport/2004/0118/arsenal.html
Bastairteile | February 21st, 2007 @ 1:07 pm | | |
Go to about 3:10 in this video and you’ll see Henry doing exactly the same thing. Did the other players walk off? Of course not.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLzJMHFslPI
Griffo | February 21st, 2007 @ 2:51 pm | | |
David-D clearly has some issues if he cannot understand what everyone is telling him.
Even the commentators after the game (ITV1), EX PROFESSIONALS, say that the goal was legit (these people should know more then anybody else) and Lille’s manager was out of order trying to take his team off.
I DONT BELIEVE he has never heard that rule bout the 10 yards, I mean everyone who plays football has heard that rule. It has been highlighted in the press over the last few seasons because of Henry.
I would love to know what team this cunt supports, but have a hunch its not the red devils.
your_mom_is_fat | February 21st, 2007 @ 3:04 pm | | |
Giggs is God.
Brilliant man.
Get over it.
All you babies crying over this, go buy a supply of Kleenex.
Lille got served, rightly so.
Matt | February 21st, 2007 @ 4:22 pm | | |
ahah oh god, i can’t believe there are still idiots like david d defending this after the length of explanation i gave. i pointed out that everyone that PLAYS knows this, you then say ‘i haven’t even heard of….’. you clearly don’t play. haah. ‘the fact that the wall was formed shows man u WERE GOING TO TAKE THE TEN YARDS’ you are a moron. you either ask for it or you don’t. if a team gives it up anyway then the goalkeeper needs to pay attention cuz you don’t have to wait for shit. giggs is merely double checking with the ref that the ball is still live. much like i do in my shitty divisional football i play in CANADA. the only reason the Lille team is so upset is cuz this barely works in my league, the reason why being everyone actually knows the rules and doesn’t fall for this same under 12 tactic that really should never work at the pro level. i was born in Manchester so i guess that makes me a glory seeker? what does the tottenham game have to do with it??!! jesus, that was horrible decision by the referee, of course the ball was over the line, it was the linesmans job to see that. and get this, it was the goalkeepers fault. i can admit when my goalkeeper is being a twat, now Lille fans have to do the same if they get knocked out this round.
Charlie | February 21st, 2007 @ 4:42 pm | | |
legal goal … its fine for one lille you will never get a chance at the CHAMPS LEAGUE CUP lol .. man u do .. henry did it 2 chelsea and villa .its all legal . next time lille learn from your mistakes and shut the fuck up as for taking the players off you are PROS not under 10’s … grow up act ya age ffs
David-D | February 21st, 2007 @ 5:01 pm | | |
Matt…..from Canada !! Sorry just got to stop myself laughing, oh well your nothing if not honest !!
You keep yerself happy believing that the free kick was legit !!
Basterteille – thanks for the link you have helped to PROVE my point, the Henry goal more than likely stood because the opposition player was still only two yards from the ball, therby making it far more difficult to score and they hadn’t retreated the full 10 yards unlike Lille.
I played football for many years and NEVER remember asking the ref for the wall to go ten yards it was just a known fact that’s what you do, If you take the kick before the whistle blows the ref will pull the game back.
If you want to take it quick and no one has retreated then fine, but about 5 minutes had passed before Giggs got permission to shoot into an unguarded net
The ref never blew his whistle , Lille had no idea that Giggs wold be allowed to take the kick. Under these circumstances then goalkeepers will never be able to line their wall up as they will be leaving the whole goal empty for someone to stick the ball in the net a la Giggs – cheating red scum
Un*ted have form for getting assistance from the referee which is why I mentioned Spurs or how about 7 minutes injury time or how about Tranaldo diving for pens at Boro and Spurs
Griffo of course the ITV commentators favour Un*ted they’ve got to keep their customers a la the Man U muppets happy ! They woudln’t dare upset their captive brain dead audience.
Can I suggest you all support a proper football, sorry soccer, team rather a buch of corrupt low life cheats from Stretford, Bloody hell, even my beloved MCFC would qualify for the chumps league if we had the referee on our side week in week out.
Oh and lets not even mentione the easiest group and then the easiest draw in this round. You know you’ve won the argument when people start callingyou a c*nt.
Bye Muppets, hope your ready to jump off – the bandwagon will soon be at an end !
Blue Army !!
Yanno | February 21st, 2007 @ 5:17 pm | | |
Hahahaha Blue Army
I think it is the Red Army who’s taking it this year with +45 GD and more to come. Referees’ mistakes are your big excuse? common you can do better than that to justify your JEALOUSY…
Blue Army….. never heard of it…..never seen it…. it seems that they are down there, very far far away. It also seems that there are a lot of teams in the EPL that have the refs on their side for the BLUE ARMY to be in this deep shit.
carlyid | February 21st, 2007 @ 5:50 pm | | |
SACRE BLA BLA bla….good thinking by Rooney+Giggs,deal with it Lille.Moaning about it wont cover the fact you were not focused.:)>-
Tony | February 21st, 2007 @ 6:53 pm | | |
Much as I hate Man United this was a legal goal. It’s pretty basic stuff, if your opponent gets a free kick go and stand in front of the ball. It takes one player to go and stand right in front of the ball. Then the referee has to move you back. If you just mess about with a wall then you’re asking for trouble.
I still hate Man United.
Tony | February 21st, 2007 @ 6:56 pm | | |
But I should reminisce about the crybaby Rags who kicked off about Robbie Fowler scoring a goal for City against the scum in the exact same situation.
Matt | February 21st, 2007 @ 8:02 pm | | |
people get embarrassed when they concede shitty goals, thats all thats happened here. David d, you are clueless. “about 5 minutes had passed before Giggs got permission to shoot into an unguarded net”. you’re gonna have to click on the video again you moron. no one cares when the kick was given, lets see you count five mins from when rooney puts the ball down, till giggs kicks it. NOT EVEN ONE SECOND. WATCH THE VIDEO. you’re clearly a bitter chelsea fan because you can’t just buy the league. you want to claim Ronaldo??? how about Joe Cole? Arjen Robben? Drogba from last season?? all divers.
the only reason Chelsea will never score a goal like this is because the other team gets to wait while six chelsea players argue over who gets to take the damn kick in the first place. play as a team you blue whores
mel | February 21st, 2007 @ 9:24 pm | | |
uh divers.. henry’s also a diver once inawhile lol.. italy has heaps of divers.. so? d game still goes on.. they dun juz walk out like that..
seriously.. everything’s cool in that game.. onli fact is WHY WALK OUT? like damn heroes? they shud spend d remaning time and try to score a goal!
And.. that goal isn’t easy.. from such angle to d other by giggs.. a total stunning goal..
WhaEva | February 22nd, 2007 @ 11:45 am | | |
David-D, you’re a clown.
“Basterteille – thanks for the link you have helped to PROVE my point, the Henry goal more than likely stood because the opposition player was still only two yards from the ball, therby making it far more difficult to score and they hadn’t retreated the full 10 yards unlike Lille.”
What the hell has that got to do with it? The Henry goal stood for the same reason the United goal stood, becuase you don’t have to wait for the wall to be set up unless you specifically ask the ref to do so. Why should you? The foul has been committed against you, so why should the team who has committed the foul gain ANY advantage?
I now realise why you can’t just see sense – you’re a city fan, and therefore hate everything united do.
Yeah united are top of the league, of course their team is uselss, rooney is crap, scholes is crap, OBVIOUSLY the only reason they’re on top is because the refs are constantly giving them an advantage [/sarcasm]
Your comments saying that the football experts are only agreeing that the goal is legit to please united fans and keep TV ratings high are laughable. You really, REALLY haven’t a clue.
David - D | February 22nd, 2007 @ 2:11 pm | | |
Okay WhaEva so lets take it your right – This MUST be a new rule because I played for 15 years and NEVER got asked ‘did I want the wall 10 yards’ – That’s just what happens and then you wait for the refs to give you permission to take the kick – that is IF it has not been taken quickly ie within seconds not minutes or even thirty seconds. Matt, I was exaggerating to make the point, the clip only shows from when Rooney picks up the ball not from when the foul was committed. Numbskull !
Thought I would also check the official FIFA rules on direct free kicks outside the penalty area just to shut you muppets up once and for all. It states quite clearly that for a direct free kick ‘outside the penalty area’ then the opposing players MUST be AT LEAST 10 yards from the ball before the ball is ‘in play’. The ball is ‘in play’ when it is kicked and moves.
Therefore if the players are not ‘at least’ ten yards away then the kick must be retaken. Therefore, if the referee has not ensured the players are ten yards away then he should not have allowed the free kick to be taken.
As it was he flouted the rules and said ‘ go on Ryan you take it there is an empty net for you to shoot in’
It really is laughable how you make the rules up to make yourselves feel better. Please point me to the rule that says the attacking player must confirm he wants the ball ten yards, if that’s the case whats the point of a referee !!?
You lot really are MUPPETS you need the referee to help you beat Lille, quite sad really. The fact that its so blatant tells me all I already suspected about the helping hand Man U continually get from officials…. you’re really not that good are you ?
your_mom_is_fat | February 22nd, 2007 @ 2:24 pm | | |
David-D, i’m willing to bet your mom is fat.
Only fat people get butt hurt when they’re proven wrong.
shut up and go fetch me a fiji water.
I guess we should go back in history and erase Henry’s whistle less free kick some seasons ago, eh?
Go to hell Lille.
Matt | February 23rd, 2007 @ 11:50 pm | | |
welll to all you people that were so determined you were right, i guess you can now focus your attacks on uefa cuz they seem to agree with me that the goal was legal
Andrew | February 24th, 2007 @ 2:05 pm | | |
David – D it is obvious that you hate United and that you think that the goal should not have stood, but had it been your team you would be hailing Giggs for his quick thinking. I have seen Henry score goals in the exact same fashion at least three times, one of which was against Chelsea a couple of years ago. But if your going to oppose the goal, at least have some legit arguments. Other people have already explained it to you but you don’t seem to understand the rules, so I’ll give it a go.
When the ref blows his whistle to indicate that there was a foul, it is the only time he needs to. Unless the team awarded the free kick (in this case United) asks for 10 yards. Giggs did not ask for it so he is allowed to take it when ever he wants.
I respect Tony from comment 46 because he has not allowed his disdain for a team cloud his vision of what is a perfectly and cleverly taken goal. Rules are rules and they should be applied the same to every situation. As much as it pissed me off when Henry scored the quick free kick against Chelsea to tie the game and continue Arsenal’s undefeated (I think it was that season and I think the game finished 2-2) season it was a perfectly legal goal.
So David – D use a bit of maturity and suck it up. Besides whether you agree with the goal or not it the ref thought it was legal, UEFA thinks it is legal and the result stands. Beside the reaction of the Lille coaching staff should be of more concern to you as a football fan than the goal. The coach who told the players to get off the pitch should be sacked and any other coach on that bench who supported him.
Nathan | February 24th, 2007 @ 2:10 pm | | |
David – D it is obvious that you hate United and that you think that the goal should not have stood, but had it been your team you would be hailing Giggs for his quick thinking. I have seen Henry score goals in the exact same fashion at least three times, one of which was against Chelsea a couple of years ago. But if your going to oppose the goal, at least have some legit arguments. Other people have already explained it to you but you don’t seem to understand the rules, so I’ll give it a go.
When the ref blows his whistle to indicate that there was a foul, it is the only time he needs to. Unless the team awarded the free kick (in this case United) asks for 10 yards. Giggs did not ask for it so he is allowed to take it when ever he wants.
I respect Tony from comment 46 because he has not allowed his disdain for a team cloud his vision of what is a perfectly and cleverly taken goal. Rules are rules and they should be applied the same to every situation. As much as it pissed me off when Henry scored the quick free kick against Chelsea to tie the game and continue Arsenal’s undefeated (I think it was that season and I think the game finished 2-2) season it was a perfectly legal goal.
So David – D use a bit of maturity and suck it up. Besides whether you agree with the goal or not it the ref thought it was legal, UEFA thinks it is legal (I think their interpretation of the rules is a little more important than yours) and the result stands. Beside the reaction of the Lille coaching staff should be of more concern to you as a football fan than the goal. The coach who told the players to get off the pitch should be sacked and any other coach on that bench who supported him.
jon | February 25th, 2007 @ 4:43 pm | | |
what a goal that was the best and gr8est goal eva and who eva says its no goal they can suk thier arse
MattU | March 2nd, 2007 @ 3:33 am | | |
it’s funny how people who don’t know the laws of the game attack man utd and giggs. lille should have forced man utd to ask for 10 by starting their wall closer to the spot of the foul. that would cause the restart to be initiated by a whistle. also, the entire walk-off incident, pathetic. lille should be punished along with the coach/trainer who held on to the football to prevent the game from continuing.
khadharow | March 6th, 2007 @ 11:53 pm | | |
yeah i didn’t watch this game but my team win the game i am proud of them man united love all players.:o
Daniel | May 16th, 2007 @ 1:40 pm | | |
Im a man utd fan but i do think the goal should be disallowed he never even blew the whistle[-([-([-([-([-([-([-([-([-([-([-([-(%%-
soccerlike | September 5th, 2008 @ 6:02 pm | | |
I feel cheated with the goal.. :o